So we haven't looked at any of the entry-level ones as of late RyanSmithAT: We haven't reviewed a FSP PSU in quite a while.The lack of quality on there is embarrassing now This time we wanted to take a look at a lithium-ion based unit, wвЂ¦ RyanSmithAT: Here's the second of our two initial UPS reviews.RyanSmithAT: I worked on the first-generation Xserve back when I worked in IT.

Thank you to Rosewill for providing us with PSUs and RK-9100 keyboards. Thank you to OCZ for providing us with PSUs. Thank you to MSI for providing us with the GTX 770 Lightning GPUs. Thank you to G.Skill and Corsair for providing us with memory. Thank you to Crucial for providing us with MX200 SSDs. Thank you to Corsair for providing us with an AX1200i PSU. Thank you to Cooler Master for providing us with Nepton 140XL CLCs. Thank you to ASRock and ASUS for providing us with some IO testing kit. Thank you to ASUS for providing us with GTX 980 Strix GPUs and the R7 240 DDR3 GPU. Thank you to AMD for providing us with the R9 290X 4GB GPUs. We must thank the following companies for kindly providing hardware for our test bed: In order to remain consistent, we implement an OS-level unique high performance mode on all the CPUs we test which should override any motherboard manufacturer performance mode. There is also an added issue of the motherboard remaining consistent, depending on how the motherboard manufacturer wants to add in their own boosting technologies over the ones that Intel would prefer they used. The dynamics of CPU Turbo modes, both Intel and AMD, can cause concern during environments with a variable threaded workload. Intel Core i7-6700K (ES, Retail Stepping), 91W, $350Д¤ Cores, 8 Threads, 4.0 GHz (4.2 GHz Turbo) OK, a few more words before results вЂ“ all of these numbers can be found in our overclocking database Bench alongside the stock results and can be compared to other processors. (Voltage is read incorrectly on the right.) We actually got the CPU to 4.9 GHz, as shown on the right, but it was pretty unstable for even basic tasks. Enough of the babble вЂ“ time for fewer words and more results! Starting with the 4.2 GHz frequency of the i7-6700K processor, we tested this alongside every 200 MHz jump up to 4.8 GHz in both our shortened CPU testing suite as well as iGPU and GTX 980 gaming. In this mini-test (performed initially in haste pre-IDF, then extra testing after analysing the IGP data), I called on a pair of motherboards - ASUS's Z170-A and ASRock's Z170 Extreme7+ - to provide a four point scale in our benchmarks.

Both ASUS and MSI have also stated similar prospects in their press guides that accompany our samples, although as with any launch there is some prospect that goes along with the evolution of understanding the platform over time. In the Skylake review we stated that 4.6 GHz still represents a good target for overclockers to aim for, with 4.8 GHz being indicative of a better sample. In this mini-test, we tested our short-form CPU workload as well as integrated and discrete graphics at several frequencies to see where the real gains are. With a new motherboard and the same liquid cooler, the same processor that performed 4.6 GHz gave 4.8 GHz with relative ease. Our overclock testing showed that 4.6 GHz was a reasonable marker for our processors however fast forward two weeks and that all seems to change as updates are released. At the time of our Skylake review of both the i7-6700K and the i5-6600K, due to the infancyВ of the platform and other constraints, we were unable to probe the performance uptake of the processors as they were overclocked.

Intel burn test tutorial